This is a story that illustrates the point that natural
alternatives are not always safer.
The pet, a beloved Pomeranian named “Ginger”, nearly succumbed to a
reaction to the natural chemicals in Citrilux Shampoo, marketed by Pet Edge as
“solves flea and itching problems naturally!” Here is the story in Ginger’s owner’s words:
A professional groomer that I hired for the first time,
groomed my dog on July 19,2012. The shampoo name is Citrilux by Petedge.
This shampoo contains d-limonene and pennyroyal oil in it. Two
ingredients that are extremely noted and studied for being very harmful to
dogs, especially if not used properly.
On July 21,2012 my dog had red and inflamed skin all
over. Our vet saw her and treated her for what he believed was a slight
reaction to something. A couple days later my dog got so ill she was
referred to our local Vet specialty hospital where she was in ICU, diagnosed
with vasculitis. They did a skin biopsy and it showed evidence of a drug reaction
to topical shampoo. A couple days later, my dog also had to be placed in an
oxygen chamber because her lungs filled up with blood. The internal
medicine vet put her survival rate at a 10. Our family was devastated
with this news.
I spoke with the groomer about my dog's reaction and
she just keeps saying “wow how bizarre”. I know she did not intentionally
want to harm my dog but when she used a product within her service, she
represents it. She really should have done what I did and researched the
ingredients and she would have found out what I the lay person found out
- That these natural ingredients are toxic to dogs and is known to burn
skin and in some cases have a fatal outcome. Thank God my dog fought for
her life and is still with me and my family today. We are nursing her
back to health one day at a time.
So whether you are a consumer or a pet groomer, please read
and inform yourself about the ingredients of a pet shampoo. Especially if
you are a professional groomer, be more cautious about the products you are
using on our “family members”, it may cause harm, because remember the
ingredients are not regulated by anyone.
GINGER IN ICU AT VET
TAKING A CLOSER
LOOK AT CITRILUX SHAMPOO
The
more I look at the Pet Edge website and how this shampoo is marketed, the more
angry I get. I must confess that
the irresponsible marketing of “natural” products as safer or better
alternatives is a pet peeve of mine. Citrilux pet shampoo is a Top Performance
brand of shampoo, manufactured by Pet Edge. Here is how the product is described on the Pet Edge
website:
The specially developed, proven
formula Top Performance® Citrilux® Shampoo contains 5% d-Limonene,
extract of pennyroyal, eucalyptus bark, aloe vera, and other natural oils.
•
Leaves a pleasant citrus scent
•
Excellent sudsing action.
•
Solves flea and dry, itching skin
problems
•
Formulated with natural oils,
aloe vera, and eucalyptus bark
This full-strength pet shampoo
formula is ready to use. Safe for use with organophosphates and carbamate-based
insecticides. Citrilux®Shampoo is safe for puppies and kittens over 12 weeks
old. Available in 17 oz., Gallon, and 2.5 Gallon sizes.
What is d-Limonene? A
component of citrus oil, most commercial d-Limonene is a by-product of the
orange juice manufacturing process.
This chart shows the process:
Five
percent d-Limonene is a lot. D-Limonene
has many uses, including as a cleaner and degreaser. It is a powerful solvent and defatting agent. In her book, Holistic Aromatherapy for Animals, Kristin Leigh Bell recommends
that essential oils be used no more than 1-2% in direct application to
animals.
There’s
more: d-Limonene easily oxidizes in the presence of air and degrades into an
oxidized form that has been identified as a potent skin sensitizer (causes
allergic reaction). This can
happen from improper handling or storage of the chemical, or during normal use
of a product containing the chemical.
Shampoo products are constantly exposed to air as they are opened and
used. As more empty space is
created in a bottle, more air is trapped and serves to oxidize the
d-Limonene. We don’t know if the
Citrilux shampoo contains any anti-oxidants to prevent this process. Another good example of why pet groomers
need full disclosure of product ingredients!
Pennyroyal.
Why is this highly toxic substance still showing up in pet
products? While it is an effective
insect repellant, it is also high in ketones making it dangerous for animals,
and the main chemical component, pulegone, can cause abortion.
It is just NOT SAFE. Click
here to read my article on this substance written seven years ago. Or click here to read something from a botanical website. The use of Pennyroyal at all seems irresponsible, and to use
it in a product that contains d-Limonene, a defatting agent that attacks the
skin barrier function, seems doubly so.
The d-Limonene may allow the Pennyroyal to penetrate the skin and enter
the blood stream. Have there been
any studies of the combined effect of these two substances? Not that I could find.
Eucalyptus
Bark. HMM! I have never seen Eucalyptus BARK as an
ingredient in a liquid product. Mostly Eucalyptus is an essential oil from leaves. There are hundreds of varieties of
Eucalyptus, each of which has its own chemical profile. To make a more elucidative comment, we
would need to know which variety and if we are really talking about bark or
distilled oil. One thing to keep
in mind: some varieties of Eucalyptus oil contain significant amounts of
limonene and linalool, which might act as a synergizer for the d-Limonene.
Summary
and Comments.
What
has me most outraged is that the manufacturer of this product would state that
it is “Safe for use on puppies and kittens over 12 weeks old”. On what basis do they make this claim? It
certainly was not safe for little Ginger. They do not back up this claim with
reference to any safety studies. Chances are, there were none. Safety studies are not required for pet products. There is plenty of evidence of the
toxicity of Pennyroyal, and growing evidence that d-Limonene can be toxic to
cats. All MSDS of d-Limonene make
a point of its potential for skin irritation and include safe handling warnings
about possible oxidation. The use
and handling suggestions for Citrilux contain no warnings that some animals
might be irritated or information about avoiding constant exposure to air.
It
would seem that Citrilux shampoo has been made available to fill the demand for
more natural products and is marketed on the false assumption that “if it’s
natural it must be safe.” It also
seems clear that the formulator of this product did not give a wink to the complexity
of the chemistry involved in the use of essential oils. Botanical ingredients are used as
though they are totally benign. We
use these natural ingredients as though they are less chemical, when actually
they are sometimes more chemically complex than synthetic ingredients. Formulators, shampoo manufacturers, and
sales reps need to do their homework on the complexities of these natural
ingredients. They need to be
forthcoming with complete ingredient information and their usage and safety
recommendations need to reflect the chemical nature of their natural
ingredients.
8/29/12 Addendum - Here is what Ginger's owner writes about her experience in contacting Pet Edge about her dog's reaction to the Citrilux:
8/29/12 Addendum - Here is what Ginger's owner writes about her experience in contacting Pet Edge about her dog's reaction to the Citrilux:
When I called PetEdge the receptionist told me that I needed to tell my story to one of their techs. So I did and he said that he would have the owner give me a call back, so he took my name and number. I NEVER heard back from them. The groomer that used this shampoo on my Ginger called me and told me that PetEdge never heard of me when she called to complain. Hmmm? I told the groomer that the EPA emailed me that it does not recommend d-limonene to be used on dogs or cats. After I told her this she said that she said that my Ginger was the unlucky dog who reacted to this shampoo and she is not going to discontinue using this product, that she loves it! How ignorant she is, sorry. The vet specialist that took care of Ginger at the hospital said that her severe reaction was rare like one in one thousand but that it should not matter she still had a severe reaction. My local TV channel 4(NBC) is doing a story about this. They interviewed me last week and they will be interviewing the specialist vet on September 4th and the dermatology vet will be doing her own research and get back to me on Sept. 24th with her findings. She believes the shampoo harmed my dog but she thinks that it is more of a negligent application that caused it, like the groomer overexposed Ginger by leaving it on too long or didn't rinse it well. She is going to be comparing all the symptoms and evidence then put in writing her medical opinion. A woman at the National Pesticide Institute Center told me that the Centrilux shampoo is not labeled as a flea product but contains flea insecticides/repellant, so the EPA and The FDA do not have to look at this. She and the EPA agent have forwarded my story to the proper authorities at their regional branches. I am also working closely with the assemblywoman Amy Paulin and trying to get a small bill passed for proper labeling and I am also working with a Humane Society attorney who is helping me. Thank you for your help I hope this helps.
I hope you sent this information to the lady who groomed your poor dog. She should understand what she's using, she's lucky youre not taking her to court over this, it just seems negligent on her part. Hope your "fire-baby" is doing much better!
ReplyDeleteI would love to print this...is there any way to do so?
ReplyDeleteI just now printed it out by selecting "print" on the browser bar.
ReplyDeleteI have attended Bathing and Brush out clinics that were very informative about the chemical make-up of shampoos. This again reinforces that knowledge of product is so important. This is actually the first I have seen a herbal/chemical reaction on a dog so severe. Are there any other cases associated with this particular product? Just wanted to say thanks for posting the info.
ReplyDeleteBarbara, your information, as always, is priceless. It is so difficult sometimes to determine if a product is safe to use because the ingredents are not listed. As a result I have choosen not to use such products. However, the products that I do use still may have unlisted ingredents. Most fustrating and scary.
ReplyDeleteThe information about to shave or or not to shave was equally helpful. I get pretty upset with some of the groomers that I know that will shave down everything and anything without a single concern. Thank-you again.
I'm so sorry for what happened to sweet little Ginger... but so glad that she fought to stay with you, and that you have your little Ginger back. I'm appalled at the attitude and behavior of the groomer & Pet Edge. They should be ashamed of themselves.
ReplyDeleteTricia & the woofers
Thank you Tricia, I am ashamed at the behaviors and response from PetEdge and the groomer. We are so happy Ginger fought her way back. She is a sweetheart! Dogs need their owners to care for them, about them and "speak" for them. Thank you everyone for your kind wishes. And thank you Barbara for your great job on helping me get this information out to the public.
DeleteI know I am a few months late on the subject, but I just stumbled on this particular article and would like to say that the use of flea shampoo such as this (that is known for the occasional reaction, let's say one dog per year-- not "enough" to remove) is entirely too common in our industry. That ONE pet a year is someone's loved one, and risking their life because the others don't react just doesn't sit well with me.
ReplyDeleteIt's never too late to weigh in on this one! One problem in the pet products industry is that no risk assessments are required. We have no idea if Ginger is one in a hundred or one in ten thousand. Manufacturers are given no guidelines for the use of d'limonene or Tea Tree (Melaleuca) oil, or other essential oils. In the beauty industry, hair dressers are advised to conduct patch tests before using certain products that have a history of causing reactions. Patch testing is suggested in the written inserts accompanying most hair color products, for example. Most pet groomers, OTOH, have never even heard of patch testing. And we call ourselves "professional". Twenty four hour patch tests should be conducted on any animals that have a history of allergic response, or any products that have a history of severe reactions. IMHO, patch testing should become a recognized protocol for pet groomers. It's easy enough - simply ask the pet owner to stop by a day or two before the scheduled grooming and get a tiny sample of the diluted product to apply in a easily observed area such as the inner thigh of the animal. Have them apply the sample to the patch of skin and observe for redness or rash.
DeleteDogs experiencing epidermal necrosis associated with d-limoene are usually in pain and systemically ill. Anemia and liver and kidney damage may also occur. Supportive care is usually essential until the condition resolves. Severe forms of this condition are similar in severity to what is seen in third degree burn victims, with extensive skin damage resulting in skin sloughing, depression, shock, coma and often death.
DeleteIn Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy XIII 1999. pp.556
Muller and Kirk's Small Animal Dermatology 1995. pp.590
In studies & cases from Journal of Venterinary Medicine, AVMA, EPA, NIH, CDC, WHO, NLM, TOXNET, PUBMED -- D-limonene's health effects on dogs and cats have documented to cause eye, skin and lung irritation in varying degrees, also exhibited hypothermia, tremors, paralysis,central nervous system effects, respiratory effects, behavioral changes, ataxia, agitation, seizures,liver & kidney failure, septicemia and other life threatening skin disorders.
Dogs experiencing epidermal necrosis associated with d-limoene are usually in pain and systemically ill. Anemia and liver and kidney damage may also occur. Supportive care is usually essential until the condition resolves. Severe forms of this condition are similar in severity to what is seen in third degree burn victims, with extensive skin damage resulting in skin sloughing, depression, shock, coma and often death.
DeleteIn Kirk's Current Veterinary Therapy XIII 1999. pp.556
Muller and Kirk's Small Animal Dermatology 1995. pp.590
In studies & cases from Journal of Venterinary Medicine, AVMA, EPA, NIH, CDC, WHO, NLM, TOXNET, PUBMED -- D-limonene's health effects on dogs and cats have documented to cause eye, skin and lung irritation in varying degrees, also exhibited hypothermia, tremors, paralysis,central nervous system effects, respiratory effects, behavioral changes, ataxia, agitation, seizures,liver & kidney failure, septicemia and other life threatening skin disorders.