IS THERE ANTI-FREEZE IN MY PET SHAMPOO?
There is an urban myth circulating through
the pet grooming industry that mainstream pet shampoos may contain a toxic anti-freeze
ingredient. In order to dispel
this myth, it is necessary to distinguish between ethylene glycol and propylene
glycol.
Ethylene Glycol (EG) is a moderately toxic chemical that
is used primarily as an antifreeze and engine coolant and in the manufacture of
PET plastic. When ingested orally, it causes kidney damage and is often fatal,
especially to small animals and children.
Ethylene glycol is not used as a cosmetic ingredient.
Propylene Glycol (PG) is an organic alcohol that is not
toxic and is GRAS (Generally Regarded as
Safe) by the FDA, and is approved for use as a food additive. It has been extensively studied. Dermal application shows no irritation
or allergic response. It is not
carcinogenic and does not cause genetic mutation. Propylene Glycol is one of the most widely used cosmetic
ingredients. It is hygroscopic
(attracts water from air) and is used as a humectant, moisturizer and skin
conditioner. It also keeps
products from drying out.
Other features of PG are that
it is miscible in water and does not react with other ingredients (plays well
with others). It is also used to
stabilize products. These properties make it a popular ingredient with
cosmetics formulators.
Propylene Glycol and Ethylene
Glycol share the property of lowering the freezing point of water. Because of its low toxicity, PG has
found use in non-toxic anti-freeze applications. The answer to the question, “Is there anti-freeze in my pet
shampoo?” is “It could be.” But
you might as well ask, “Is there a moisturizer in my anti-freeze?” The fact that a substance has multiple
uses in multiple industries does not render it unsafe or undesirable for
cosmetics.
Unfortunately, one of the marketing tactics in
the highly competitive pet shampoo marketplace is to make consumers
uncomfortable with mainstream products by targeting ingredients and fueling misconceptions
and rumors about that ingredient.
Propylene Glycol has been the target of this tactic. Nearly every pet lover is aware that
anti-freeze is sure death if ingested in sufficient quantities. By associating Propylene Glycol with
anti-freeze, the fear mongers can then proudly proclaim, “We use no anti-freeze
ingredient in our shampoo.” That
claim immediately raises the suspicion that OTHER manufacturers ARE using
anti-freeze in their shampoos. To
make matters worse, there are no ingredient lists available for many pet
grooming products, so the groomer can’t even check their products for specific
items. This
lack of transparency creates a fertile field for scare tactics to flourish.
Allow me to repeat: the toxic
ingredient that makes traditional engine anti-freeze deadly is Ethylene Glycol.
There is no Ethylene Glycol in pet shampoos. Period. The cosmetic ingredient,
Propylene Glycol, has a myriad of applications, including use in NON-TOXIC
anti-freeze preparations.
Propylene Glycol has been extensively studied and all studies have been
reviewed by the CIR (Cosmetics Ingredient Review) Expert Panel and determined
to be safe as used in cosmetics, including shampoos.
REFERENCES & FURTHER
READING:
Ethylene glycol monomethyl
ether and propylene glycol monomethyl ether: metabolism, disposition, and
subchronic inhalation toxicity studies.
www.cosmeticsinfo.org - search under Propylene Glycol
Its terrible how things work in the world today. With competition so high for the dollars of pet groomers and owners, using scaremongering tactics like this is just low. Its an attempt to tap into one of the base fears of human psychology, that something we can't see is harming someone close to us. Honestly, I think there needs to be more transparent labelling, a push for researching the actually status of ingredients all pet-care products, not just shampoo.
ReplyDeleteRight On! Thanks for your comment. I'm working on an article about ear cleaning products. Propylene Glycol is a major player in ear cleaners. Interestingly, most of the traditional ingredients of pet grooming products have been well-researched. Ironically, it's the newer, more 'natural' ingredients, which are being substituted for tried & true ingredients, that are least studied.
ReplyDelete